The transistor radio, usually a reliable source of electric, giddy chaos, crackled with an uncharacteristic hush. It was 1964, and the airwaves were still hot with the kinetic energy of the British Invasion. Groups from Liverpool and Manchester were setting the pace, their sound defined by insistent drum beats and jangly, twelve-string guitar propulsion. The Searchers, architects of anthems like “Needles and Pins” and “When You Walk in the Room,” were at the forefront of this revolution. They were known for their clean, aggressive pop, perfected on the Pye label under the keen ear of producer Tony Hatch.
Then, through the joyous clamor, came this whisper.
“What Have They Done To The Rain” arrived in late 1964 as a standalone single (though later appearing on US compilations like The New Searchers Album), a stylistic detour that was both commercially shrewd and artistically brave. It was an instant anomaly, a quiet folk song nestled amongst the booming heartbreakers and teen dramas dominating the charts. To understand its power, one must first recognize its origin: it is a cover of a Malvina Reynolds composition, a revered American folk singer and activist whose work often carried a sharp, humanist edge.
The Folk Strain and the Merseybeat Touch
Reynolds wrote the song in 1962, a direct response to the anxiety surrounding above-ground nuclear testing. The fallout, the invisible strontium-90, was literally being washed into the food chain by the rain. It was a potent, terrifying image—a fundamental natural element, the source of life, rendered poisonous. The Searchers, predominantly a rock and roll group who built their name on infectious enthusiasm, chose this devastating piece of music for their next single. It was a bold move, pushing the emerging protest genre into the mainstream pop lexicon.
The instrumentation is where the band’s genius for arrangement truly shines. They strip away the frenetic energy of their signature Merseybeat sound, opting for a sparser, almost haunted landscape. The rhythm section is restrained; the bass line provides a sombre, steady foundation, a slow pulse beneath the anxiety. Drummer Chris Curtis uses brushes rather than sticks for much of the track, giving the percussion a soft, almost atmospheric presence, like the light patter of the rain itself.
The electric guitar work, often so driving in their other hits, is relegated here to a gentle, chiming arpeggio played through a soft reverb. It’s not a lead instrument; it’s a texture, creating a delicate, crystalline shimmer. There is no trace of a piano in the arrangement, removing a source of potential musical brightness and keeping the mood firmly in the realm of muted contemplation. This economy of sound is crucial; every element serves to amplify the quiet despair of the lyric.
The Sound of Contamination
The song’s core emotion is delivered through the flawless, crystalline vocal harmonies that were The Searchers’ trademark. Mike Pender and Frank Allen’s voices intertwine, but they don’t soar with the typical exuberance of pop. Instead, the multi-part harmony creates a collective lament. It’s a group of people asking a communal question, their voices layered like a choir in an empty church. The delivery is devoid of anger or stridency; it is simply profound sorrow and confusion.
The production, supervised by Hatch (though his role here is more of an observer to the band’s arrangement choices), is clean but retains a certain warmth, avoiding the antiseptic quality of some contemporary recordings. When listening through quality home audio equipment, the isolation of the individual guitar notes becomes strikingly clear, each one decaying naturally in the space, enhancing the feeling of emptiness left by the absent ‘little boy’ and the ‘grass.’
“The Searchers took a raw political lament and polished it into a heartbreakingly beautiful folk-pop jewel, making the poison sound gentle.”
The lyrics themselves are delivered with an almost childlike simplicity, which heightens the horror. The verses begin with images of innocence: “Just a little rain falling all around / The grass lifts its head to the heavenly sound.” Then, the brutal twist: “And the grass is gone, the boy disappears / And rain keeps falling like helpless tears / And what have they done to the rain?” The song never explicitly names the threat—it doesn’t need to. The implication of nuclear fallout, of a natural cycle corrupted by human recklessness, hangs heavy in the air.
A Career Pivot and Lingering Echoes
By 1964, The Searchers had perfected the transition from cover band to hit-making entity, but they risked becoming formulaic. The decision to record a song so politically and tonally different from their established output—especially one that required such vocal restraint and instrumental subtlety—marks a pivot point in their career. It showed a willingness to engage with the broader folk revival movement, following the path trod by artists like Bob Dylan and Joan Baez, whose 1962 live recording had introduced many listeners to the original version of this song.
It was a commercial success, reaching the Top 15 in the UK and charting respectably in North America, proving that a protest song could find traction on the pop charts. It was a quieter victory than their earlier hits, but perhaps a deeper one, demonstrating that an album of hits did not have to rely solely on manufactured joy. This track validated the audience’s appetite for depth and provided an unexpected moment of melancholy introspection amidst the general exuberance of the era.
Today, the message resonates differently but just as powerfully. The nuclear shadow has receded slightly, but the anxieties of environmental degradation, climate change, and corporate pollution have taken its place. When a young person discovers this song via their music streaming subscription and hears the question posed in those innocent, layered voices, the essential fear remains unchanged: what happens when the things that sustain us are corrupted?
The cover version choice was not merely an aesthetic one; it was an acknowledgment of the moral complexities that lay beneath the surface of the swinging decade. It is a reminder that even the most effervescent pop group could, and occasionally should, slow down, look out the window at the falling water, and ask a devastating question. It’s a profound testament to the power of a simple melody to convey a complex, heartbreaking truth.
Listening Recommendations
-
The Seekers – “The Carnival Is Over” (1965): Shares the same beautiful, melancholic folk-pop arrangement and a stunning, mournful vocal blend.
-
The Mamas & the Papas – “California Dreamin'” (1965): Features a similar blend of acoustic folk foundation with lush, layered pop harmonies and a wistful, reflective mood.
-
Malvina Reynolds – “Little Boxes” (1962): A different kind of protest song by the original writer of “Rain,” using sharp, satirical folk observation rather than melancholy.
-
P.F. Sloan – “Eve of Destruction” (1965): A contemporary, though far more urgent and direct, folk-rock protest song reflecting the same societal anxieties of the mid-60s.
-
The Byrds – “Turn! Turn! Turn! (To Everything There Is a Season)” (1965): Another successful folk-to-pop transition, focusing on the cyclical, timeless nature of human experience with a similarly chiming guitar texture.
-
The Zombies – “A Rose for Emily” (1968): Offers a deeply poignant, narrative-driven pop song, using complex, restrained arrangements to elevate a sad, small story.